Viewing cable 09RIODEJANEIRO357, C) WAR BY ANY OTHER NAME: RIO'S "INTERNAL ARMED CONFLICT"
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09RIODEJANEIRO357 | 2009-11-03 14:02 | 2010-12-07 09:09 | CONFIDENTIAL | Consulate Rio De Janeiro |
VZCZCXRO7589 RR RUEHRG DE RUEHRI #0357/01 3071411 ZNY CCCCC ZZH R 031411Z NOV 09 FM AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5151 INFO RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 1433 RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 3554 RUEHSO/AMCONSUL SAO PAULO 0005
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RIO DE JANEIRO 000357 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/03/2019 TAGS: SOCI SNAR PGOV ASEC BR SUBJECT: (C) WAR BY ANY OTHER NAME: RIO'S "INTERNAL ARMED CONFLICT" REF: A. (A) RIO 329 ¶B. (B) RIO 346 Classified By: Principal Officer Dennis W. Hearne for
reasons 1.4 (b, d ) ¶1. (C) Summary: Rio Principal Officer, accompanied by PAO, met on 23
October with XXXX (strictly protect), XXX for the International
Committee for the Red Cross (ICRC) in Rio. XXXX has long ICRC experience
in conflict zones. It is his assessment that the situation in many
Rio favelas today is, for all practical purposes, a full-blown internal
armed conflict, and not simply an urban crime problem. While XXXX
recognizes he can say nothing of the sort publicly, and that the de
jure definition in International Humanitarian Law for "internal armed
conflict" may not describe precisely the violence in Rio, he makes
a compelling case. The corollary is that the ICRC is quietly working
in Rio favelas in much the way it does in other war zones - attempting
to establish "humanitarian spaces" for treating or evacuating the
wounded,facilitating release of captives, getting services and supplies
to civilians isolated by violence, and requesting access (not yet
granted) to gang members in prison populations. The dichotomy of
extensive armed conflict raging in a celebrated and highly developed
megacity in an economically powerful democracy may be becoming more
than Brazilians can absorb, and frustration and the focusing effect
of the 2016 Olympics in Rio seem to be galvanizing the public and
state and federal governments to seek decisive action. End summary. ¶2. (C) In a 23 October meeting with Principal Officer and PAO sought
by ICRC XXXX in Rio de Janeiro, XXXX, XXXXX made a compelling argument
that the continuing violence in Rio,s favelas constitutes, for all
practical purposes, a full-blown "internal armed conflict." XXXX said
he would never take such a position publicly, given Brazilian
sensitivities, nor does he argue that Rio,s violence matches in every
detail the de jure definition of "internal armed conflict" under
International Humanitarian Law. (Note: The relevant definition is in
Protocol II of the Geneva Conventions. End Note.) Nonetheless, in
its main features -- i.e., organized factions holding the monopoly
on violence in their areas while in an open conflict with rival factions
or/and state forces, the humanitarian impacts on innocent civilians
trapped by violence in favelas dominated by gangs, and the need for
ICRC to operate as though in a war zone to create "humanitarian
spaces" -- the gang warfare in Rio,s favelas resembles other situations
worldwide that are formally recognized by governments and international
organizations as internal armed conflicts, XXX said. XXXX speaks with
conviction, reflecting his long ICRC experience in conflict zones,
including in Haiti, in Uganda and in Sierra Leone,s civil war. In the
course of the discussion, XXX made the following specific observations:
--Currently ICRC operates in 7 Rio favelas: Mare, Parada de Lucas,
Cidade de Deus, Cantagalo, Pavao/Pavaozinho, Complexo de Alemao, and
Vila Vintem. State Security Secretary Jose Beltrame is the ICRC,s
senior interlocutor in Rio. ICRC also has asked for access to the
state prison system, which has not yet been accepted (although he
noted that there was support at federal level, including from Justice
Minister Tarso Genro); --The ICRC works to create "humanitarian
spaces" in favela conflict areas, proceeding cautiously, first
using local NGOpartners such as AfroReggae and Luta Pela Paz. In
concrete examples, this has meant trying to convince gang factions
to recognize certain places -- e.g., schools, clinics -- as "safe
areas," working to establish mechanisms to locate and negotiate
release of hostages, bringing basic supplies (including food and water)
to civilians who are regularly isolated by the most extreme violence
inside areas XXX called "favelas within favelas." ICRC is also working
with former staffers of Doctors Without Borders to address treatment
and evacuation of wounded or deceased persons, XXXX said. He noted MSF
closed its operation in the notorious Complexo de Alemao favela when
it was not regularly able to fulfill its mandate of treating wounded
citizens, owing to the grim fact that the lethality of the conflict
in Rio,s favelas leaves mostly dead victims; --Now ICRC is building
up its own network. Increasingly, its delegates speak directly with
leaders of gangs and militias, as well as with police. Contact with
gang members is not direct initially, but word of ICRC interest in
contacting specific gang leaders is passed through mediators, and
mutually acceptable conditions are set for a meeting. ICRC uses
clearly marked vehicles and communicates its movements in advance
to all sides, just as in other war zones where it operates; --ICRC
also works on health initiatives as well as education, but XXXXX
allowed that such activities were, in part, "cover" for ICRC,s efforts
to protect civilians from violence; --In prisons, ICRC is concerned
primarily with the human rights situation, and with violence driven by
gang dynamics. There is also an opportunity to meet with imprisoned
gang faction leaders to emphasize that ICRC,s work in favelas is not
political, and is intended to alleviate suffering of citizens. And there
is the humanitarian issue of facilitating contact with prisoners by
family members who may not be able to visit prisons because of factional
violence (e.g., A family member from a favela controlled by one gang
may put themselves and their incarcerated relative at risk if they
attempt to enter a prison dominated by a rival gang.); --XXXX applauds
the state Favela Pacification Program (FPP) and the community-based
Police Pacification Units (UPP) and sees their value in extending
government control and reducing the stigma of living in favelas, but
does not believe that the plan is sufficient to fundamentally change
the security situation, at least not for several years (ref A); --ICRC
must be sensitive and low-profile in its work, and XXXX pointed out
his staff is "hidden" in the basement of the historical headquarters
building of the Brazilian Red Cross national organization. The Brazilian
Red Cross is increasingly engaged by ICRC to assist in its efforts in
the favelas. ¶3. (C) Comment: One does not have to completely agree with XXXX
assessment to concede that this battle-hardened ICRC professional
makes a cogent case for viewing the situation in many of Rio,s favelas
as one of sustained internal armed conflict, as opposed to simply
urban criminal violence. The Rio combatants are, of course, rival
criminal gangs, militia groups, and the police, as opposed to political
or ethnic factions. But in the gangs, complete control of geographic
areas (Rio Governor Sergio Cabral recently referred to gang-dominated
favelas as "occupied territories"), their relatively elaborate command
and control structures, their powerful military weaponry, and in the
horrendous body count they leave behind, Rio,s gangs do resemble
combatants in recognized internal armed conflicts worldwide. A signal
distinction is that Rio,s internal armed conflict is not generalized
throughout a national or even regional theater. Instead, it is occurring
within relatively discreet urban pockets (though violence can spill
outside favelas), spread throughout a celebrated and highly developed
megacity, one of two (with Sao Paulo) in a democratic country with one
of the world,s largest economies. That cruel and decades-old dichotomy
may have become, finally, more than Rio residents and Brazil,s leaders
can absorb, and their frustration and the focusing energy of the 2016
Olympics seem to be galvanizing state, municipal and federal government.
There is a growing consenus that now is the time to confront the plague
of violence in Rio in a decisive manner, but it remains to be seen
whether Rio,s Favela Pacification Program, possible new federal-level
public security initiatives, and additional funding for public security
will be sufficient to help Rio de Janeiro quell its long internal
armed conflict. HEARNE
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário