Viewing cable 09REYKJAVIK216, REYKJAVIK OIG COMPLIANCE UPDATE/REQUEST FOR EXTENSION
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09REYKJAVIK216.
|09REYKJAVIK216||2009-12-04 16:04||2011-01-13 05:05||UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY||Embassy Reykjavik|
VZCZCXYZ0012 PP RUEHWEB DE RUEHRK #0216 3381641 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 041641Z DEC 09 FM AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4232
UNCLAS REYKJAVIK 000216 SENSITIVE SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ASIG ASEC ABLD IC SUBJECT: REYKJAVIK OIG COMPLIANCE UPDATE/REQUEST FOR EXTENSION REF: A. STATE 2995, B. STATE 085363, C. SIO-I-03-61 ¶1. (SBU) Post is committed to closing Recommendation 2 in the OIG's 2003 report (ref c) as soon as possible. Post continues to advise the OIG on the status of the Perimeter Security Upgrade Project in line with Recommendation 2 in ref c. As previously reported, Post has been denied a permit by the city of Reykjavik to build on the property because of opposition by the neighbors in the vicinity of the Mission. ¶2. (SBU) Post is still awaiting the appointment of a Chief of Mission, a process that has delayed a final decision on the construction project. Due to an anticipated arrival of a new COM sometime in spring 2010, Post requests an extension on the final decision on the project until July 2010. This extension should allow the incoming COM enough time to fully examine this complex issue and make a determination on how to proceed. ¶3. (SBU) POC is Marco A. Fernandez, RSO. Watson